I cant speak for Toyota
specifically but i DO have a decent amount of programming experience with GM ECU's (PCM'S... same thing, car computer)
ASSUMING that Toyota uses similar methods to make and program the computer, then Yes.... the calibrator could indeed effect shift points.
Here's why I say that:
When I would go into the "charts" or files of the GM (Grand Prix GTP) I would have access to different tables where it would cross reference 2 items to calculate a 3rd.
For example: MPH vs RPM to calculate timing degrees
So it would have on the right side MPH and across the top RPM.. in each "box" of the table would be what the PCM was following for the timing advance at those specified values ("X" rpm and "Y mph).
The SAME type of table was used for shift points.
I remember thinking it was funny that the car used MPH and not rpm to calculate when it shifted... but yep.. it DID use the MPH. I have no idea why, but it did.
So when I wanted to change the shift point to a few hundred rpm more, I would go to the shift settings and increase the MPH from the 60mph to 62.5 and test it... yup, shifted later.
If thats similar for our trucks, and the ECU thinks we are traveling a a slower speed than we actually are, it would be shifting later than we would be stock.
Now, who knows if this is the same for Toyota. I would guess that if people are reporting improved shifting after the Hypertech, its very likely. Maybe the exact calculations/tables arent the same, but it sounds like they may use MPH to calculate shifts.
I dont know if this would effect timing or anything like that very significantly, as the values are most likely very very close within a 4% difference in mph... but for shift points it may be enough to notice.
I agree that the 1.5 mpg gain was just the pcm getting fixed to read the correct mpg.. not an actual gain.
Just my 0.02 .. hope that makes sense.
