Again, as I mentioned, backpressure has absolutely nothing to do with it. Allow me to expain what is happening in this system that is causing the performance loss.
The exhaust as it exits the exhaust is moving in the form of pulses or pressure waves with varying speeds and pressures. These pulses have mass, and want to continue moving at a high rate of speed. These pulses if they are moving fast enough, will create a low pressure region behind them and will help draw out more spent exhaust from the engine, and will create a region of lower pressure inside the exhaust manifold.
If the system is too short, the fast moving pulse will collapse as it exits the end of the pipe, and the low pressure wake will also collapse, reducing the scavenging effect, especially at low RPM. This will be felt as a decrease in performance right off the line.
As RPMS increase, the speed and frequency of these pressure waves increases, negating some of the performance losses and restoring the scavenging effect.
Exhaust scavenging is a function of velocity, not backpressure. Having lower backpressure is a good thing. If a modification decreases the velocity, then a low RPM power loss will be the result. In the case of cutting off the muffler and not at least replacing it with a straight pipe, this modification is reducing the opportunity for the exhaust to built up and keep the speed, and it instead slowing down the exhaust as it exits, creating more backpressure than the stock muffler.
Rebels system is one that maintains velocity. He is running with very little backpressure and seemingly has gained power. The x-pipe creates a cross flow which allows the pressure waves to accelerate each other and create a positive induction.
If you replace your muffler with a piece of pipe, you will get the sound you are probably after without loosing the velocity that is essential to produce power.