Proud new owner of 2015 Sequoia (same drive-train as 4x4 Tundra) Perusing through the treads here I noticed that some folks don't rate the Toyota 4 wheel drive system very highly, and end up getting aftermarket lockers of various sorts. Putting aside the numerous posters who don't seem to know what a brake based/computer LSD system is, how to engage it, and complain when they don't have traction, how do those who actually are reasonably sure they know how to engage AutoLSD rate it?
There is a video posted on this site of the Dirt Every Day guys successfully running "hells revenge" in a stock Tundra (Pro yes, but the drivetrain is the same as my Sequoia). Now, if the AutoLSD did not "work" (at least to a significant degree - granted not exactly the same as a mechanical locker) it seems to me this run would not have been possible. Indeed, in the video you can see brief glimpses of wheels up in the air and the other wheel (on same axle) digging for traction. Obviously, the brake based/computer LSD system is "working". Now, could they do the same run multiple times without overheating the brakes? Perhaps not and thus I understand the reason for dedicated mechanical lockers - however, the Toyota brake based/computer LSD system can not be said to be "working" as intended.
Thoughts?
There is a video posted on this site of the Dirt Every Day guys successfully running "hells revenge" in a stock Tundra (Pro yes, but the drivetrain is the same as my Sequoia). Now, if the AutoLSD did not "work" (at least to a significant degree - granted not exactly the same as a mechanical locker) it seems to me this run would not have been possible. Indeed, in the video you can see brief glimpses of wheels up in the air and the other wheel (on same axle) digging for traction. Obviously, the brake based/computer LSD system is "working". Now, could they do the same run multiple times without overheating the brakes? Perhaps not and thus I understand the reason for dedicated mechanical lockers - however, the Toyota brake based/computer LSD system can not be said to be "working" as intended.
Thoughts?