![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: SLC, Utah
Posts: 722
|
Quote:
I also hear the TRD, AFE and some of the other closed box designs are good too.
__________________
In racing, speed costs money... How fast do you want to go? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Fernley, NV
Posts: 8
|
If you look at the thread "CAI -TRD -Voalnt" you'll see the pics of the TRD CAI I just installed. It certainly gives me a quicker response and throatier sound.. it appears, but not confirmed yet, better gas mileage, too. Roboduck
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Palm Springs, CA
Posts: 1,926
|
From researching, it all boils down to which one you think looks best. I liked how the AFE looked so I went with that.
__________________
Black 08 CM Post purchase Mods/Upgrades (click on item to view pic) AFE CAI Borla Dual Catback Projection Halo Headlights |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Montrose, CO
Posts: 57
|
Because I have not had the opportunity to experiment with other CAI systems I really can't say which is best. What I can say is that I have had good track history with KN and so I went with the 77 Series CAI. I got a good price through Autoanything.com. I was only able to achieve 17MPG on long trips before the install. I just checked my fuel mileage last week and I got 19.87 or lets just round to 20 MPG with the new CAI from KN. Keep in mind this is in Colorado at high altitude and cold weather. The high point is the sound that the engine makes now and the power, and although people don't agree with the 50hp increase at 3500 RPM, there is a lot more punch now from 3500-5200 RPM that turns heads when you lay into the 5.7.
__________________
Dromero5 "Yota till I die"
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 5,925
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Butler, PA
Posts: 124
|
I think it has a lot to do with the area that you live in. I do believe that it would be possible to get 22 mpg if you live in Florida or in one of the flatlander states but you won't get that kind of mileage if you live in a hilly or mountainous area unless you are able to coast down all the hills and half way up the next hill.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Posts: 5,925
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Boulder, Co.
Posts: 121
|
Altitude has a detrimental effect
__________________
2007 Crewmax 5.7 4x4 2000 Tundra Double Cab 4.7 Supercharged 4x4 1988 Sr5 Longbed V-6 4x4 1981 22R 4x4 And still own them all |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
![]() |
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|