![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#61 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: SLC, Utah
Posts: 722
|
No, it only dropped 1.5" with my travel trailer hooked up and a bunch of heavy camping equipment including a 3500 watt generator and 7 hp outboard motor in the bed.
__________________
In racing, speed costs money... How fast do you want to go? |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#63 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5
|
This person seems to be onto something here.
Possible Tundra Bed Bounce Cure Found | tundraheadquarters.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#64 (permalink) |
|
Supporting Vendor
|
This looks liek a great idea
Might have to try it and put it to the test on our great 101 freeway, but i still want the Supersprings, lol
__________________
2007 Toyota Tundra 5.7 Slate, Double Cab 1990 Nissan 240sx - Daily Driver 1989 Nissan 240sx Pro Drift Spec (the HATCH) - FOR SALE - 1991 Nissan 240sx Pro Drift Spec (the COUPE) www.RMJMOTORSPORTS.com ![]() Performance Parts - Technical Consulting/Support - Track Proven |
|
|
|
|
|
#65 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: SLC, Utah
Posts: 722
|
Quote:
Thanks for sharing that.
__________________
In racing, speed costs money... How fast do you want to go? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Boulder, Co.
Posts: 121
|
Just a bit of advice on the miracle "fix". After some time the foam took a "set", thus greatly reducing the dampening effect. ( I read all the treads). The real soultion to this problem needs to come from TOYOTA. Just one mans opinion.
__________________
2007 Crewmax 5.7 4x4 2000 Tundra Double Cab 4.7 Supercharged 4x4 1988 Sr5 Longbed V-6 4x4 1981 22R 4x4 And still own them all |
|
|
|
|
|
#67 (permalink) | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4
|
Quote:
With this approach I basically used the frame to hold the rear section of the Super Spring down as I worked the front down and then went to the back. When I attached the front roller without putting tension on it, the rear was 4-5" higher than it should be which prevented me from getting the rear roller attached. I was finally able to get this together. After I figured out the first side the second side went very quickly. However, there is so much preload on the springs that the truck sits about 1 1/2" taller. Does this seem right? I have not read of anybody else having this challenge. I am at least 1 1/2" taller with the rollers in the low position. Any thoughts would be appreciated. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 (permalink) | |
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: L.A California
Posts: 6,602
|
Quote:
DEAVER Products. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#71 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 46
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#72 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 20
|
I bought supersprings back in early January. They say "SS A9" on the bottom, but the manual inside the box says SSA14. Anyone have an idea on this?
I'm also interested as to how this changes the payload capacity, as the last poster before me asked about. Drew |
|
|
|
|
|
#73 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4
|
SSA11's Installed
I have an '08 Double Cab Tundra with standard 6.5' bed and after all the great reviews of the Super Springs I took the plunge for the SSA11's.
On my truck the SSA11's needed to be pulled down about 5" in order to secure the second roller. This put so much preload on the spring pack that it raised the truck nearly 3" and really stiffened up the ride. Most of the installs I have seen pictures of or read reviews about the Super Springs required very little effort to pull the Super Spring down to the original spring pack. This was not the case for me and I was lucky to have large C clamps to pull the Super Spring down onto the original spring pack. I called Super Springs to see if this was normal and they were outstanding to work with. They sent out some longer shackles to see if that would take some of the preload out of the heavy duty SSA11 spring with the standard shackle. I installed the springs a second time when the long shackles arrived and the long shackles took much or the preload out of the Super Spring that was raising the truck and making the ride harsher than I wanted when unloaded. The problem with the longer shackles is they would hit the frame when the truck was loaded. I called Super Springs again to discuss and we are now going to go with the less heavy duty SSA7's. The 7's should be ideal for me because I am not hauling extremely heavy loads all that often, but when I do, the extra help of a Super Spring would be great. The 7 is a thinner spring blade and will not preload the truck as much or make the ride as harsh when unloaded as the 11's did. I will update once I get the 7's installed. As of today I would say the 11's are probably ideal for somebody who is constantly carrying at least several hundreds of pounds in the bed. For that type of situation the SSA11 should be ideal, but be sure you have some long "C" clamps for the installation. However, if the truck is not loaded that often and you just need the Super Springs for the occasional heavy load or weekend towing, the SSA7's may be better. With the 11's and no load in the bed the ride was quite firm and truck kind of looked silly with the back raised almost 3" in my opinion. The folks at Super Springs are very helpful and responsive. This new Tundra has been a challenge for them in identifying the proper springs to use on the Tundra but they are committed to making it work and extremely helpful. |
|
|
|
|
|
#74 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 46
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#75 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4
|
I received the SSA7's today and immediatly installed them. The SSA7's came with the same brackets as the SSA11's on one side and one a bit shorter on the other end.
Thankfully, I still had the SSA11's and harvested the slightly longer bracket from them so that I had equal length brackets on the front and back of the SSA7's. With this bracket system the install was much cleaner. I still had to compress the back about 5" after the front bracket and roller was attached, but there is much less tension/preload in the SSA7's which makes it much easier to turn down far enough to attach the rear roller. The SSA7's only lifted the rear of the truck about 1" as opposed to about 3" with the SSA11's. I have not had a chance to evaluate the ride, but expect it will be acceptable. My truck is an '08 Double Cab and did not have any bed bounce issues. It is the most sure footed truck I have owned and I have had 1/2 and 3/4 ton Chevy's for the past 15 years, trading every 3-4 years. My primary reason for the Super Springs was to give me a greater capacity for weight for those few times each year my payload is at or above the truck's limits. I am hopeful these springs will accomplish this. It is such a simple concept I cannot see how it will not help. Many who struggle with the bed bounce or commented on the Super Springs have '07 trucks. I am not aware of any spring changes from one to the other, but do know the SSA11's would have only been good for me if I always had a load of let's say 1,000# or more in the bed. Otherwise the preload was just too great and ride too stiff. Not the great ride the Tundra had without the Super Springs. The SSA7's seem to be just the ticket. I will have to leave bed bounce discussions to those who are experiencing them as thankfully I am not. I will post if I find the ride negatively impacted by the Super Springs, but I do expect all is good with the SSA7's. Last edited by Ralphie : 04-19-2008 at 01:04 AM. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
![]() |
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|