![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 9
|
Mpg
Has Anybody Tried A Tornado Fuel Saver, It's suppossed to get you 2 or 3 MPG more. I found one for my 08 5.7 liter for $50 on line.
__________________
2008 CrewMax 4WD 5.7 Liter * 2" Toytec leveling kit * BushWacker OE Fender Flares * 285/65 R18 BFG All-Terrains* Line-X Spray on Bed Liner |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Huntington,Indiana
Posts: 4,295
|
Do a search for throttle body spacers and you'll see not much savings there .
__________________
![]() 2008 Crewmax X-SP carbon Fiber Dash kit 20" JTI Rims BFG AT KO 285/55/20 AFE C.A.I w/ Dry Pro filter and the AFE Mod Blacked out Headlight Mod. Flo~Pro muffler #744 Toytec 3" front , 1" rear blocks and Diff. lowering kit
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Huntington,Indiana
Posts: 4,295
|
__________________
![]() 2008 Crewmax X-SP carbon Fiber Dash kit 20" JTI Rims BFG AT KO 285/55/20 AFE C.A.I w/ Dry Pro filter and the AFE Mod Blacked out Headlight Mod. Flo~Pro muffler #744 Toytec 3" front , 1" rear blocks and Diff. lowering kit
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 9
|
Is there anything else out there that would help? If I could get just a couple more MPGs I would be happy. I went from an 04 Tacoma that got about 16 so I am not expecting miracles but a little help would be nice...
__________________
2008 CrewMax 4WD 5.7 Liter * 2" Toytec leveling kit * BushWacker OE Fender Flares * 285/65 R18 BFG All-Terrains* Line-X Spray on Bed Liner |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New England
Posts: 102
|
Quote:
Cheers, Bob
__________________
Never approach a dock any faster than you want to hit it. SAC Proverb: Nothing is too good for the troops, so nothing is what they'll get. USAF Retired: 1974 - 1994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Bridgeport , Il.
Posts: 166
|
Never even heard of that before. Try the cold air intake. I saved about a 1 mpg with the trd version cai. for about $350.00 it would take you about a year or so to break even depending on how much you drive. For me its about a year and a half.
__________________
2007 TUNDRA TRD CREWMAX LIMITED TRD CAI TRD EXHAUST |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 319
|
Quote:
Why not try and get the best mileage possible? Fuel economy is important to nearly everyone, including myself. I need/want a full size but also want the best mileage I can get.....that is common sense. -------------------Dave, Could be the BFG's that are causing you to get poor mileage. They are a heavy tire |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 9
|
Quote:
__________________
2008 CrewMax 4WD 5.7 Liter * 2" Toytec leveling kit * BushWacker OE Fender Flares * 285/65 R18 BFG All-Terrains* Line-X Spray on Bed Liner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 86
|
One thing that works is "engine shutdown at idle". I believe that the US Government estimated that 10-15% could be saved if vehicles didn't idle when stopped in traffic.
I know that right after I reset the graph on our Prius after a fillup, when the engine is idling at a light, you can watch the cumulative gas mileage on the screen tick down like a countdown timer. GM put this in their "mild hybrid" pickup, but the starter doesn't work like the Prius, and there is a slight delay between when you step on the throttle and when the engine starts. They say it can be "disconcerting", especially in emergency situations. The Prius avoids this via their power-splitting device between the engine (referred to as the ICE/Internal Combustion Engine), the electric motor and the drive train. (Sorry to rant on about the Prius on this Tundra site, but it's the only hybrid vehicle that I am familiar with.) If Toyota could put something like this on the Tundra, it could increase the mileage by a few mpg, though it's effectiveness would be more pronounced for those who drive in stop-and-go traffic. Those of us who drive mostly on the highway would see no difference. The biggest design change would be the integration of a new starter motor on the Tundra. Because the electric motor is one of the drive components in the Prius, it is relatively large (in hp); and it can spin the ICE instantaneously. Also, the lag is almost non-existent, because the electric motor produces most of the starting torque to the drive wheels when accelerating. (The ICE is tuned for high fuel economy, and utilizes the Atkinson-cycle, instead of the Otto-cycle used by most cars and trucks; and it doesn't generate much torque at low rpm.) This is probably one of the cheapest design changes that would work for large vehicles that tow stuff. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 89
|
This'll make your head spin!
The tornado does not work to improve fuel economy.
What the tornado and any other throttle body insert(not spacer) does is reduce the size of the intake tube...that's it. Doesn't matter how you pitch the blade or how shiny it is. By doing this, you make the engine more responsive at low rpm because the intake stroke is more efficient. In doing so, the engine is then choked for air at higher rpm and you step harder on the throttle. Think of it this way, if you have a small diameter straw and a large diameter straw and you are drawing fluid thru it, which one takes less effort to start drawing fluid? The small one, right? But you have to really work to get a high volume. The large one takes more effort but when you do get fluid going, you get a larger volume. Toyota's engineers calculate what the optimum intake plenum size is for 381 hp at whatever rpm. Don't waste your money unless you REALLY like shiny things. Now, throttle body spacers have a similar effect. What you are doing here is lengthening the intake track making the engine work a bit harder at lower rpm because you have increased the intake volume...like increasing the straw length. However, as the engine speed increases, so does the efficiency because now you have a ramming effect of the fuel and air at a higher velocity headed to the combustion chamber. Then, you end up cramming more fuel and air into the combustion chamber and more power. Like a longer straight-a-way on a racetrack or a longer straw from before. These may yield better performance at higher rpm but i doubt it would pay for it's self. You are talking like a half an inch or so of increased length. And you won't get better gas mileage because you'll have your foot in it to get any effect! Again, this has been calculated by Toyota...and every other engine manufacturer. The iForce even has variable valve timing to compensate for lower rpm so let the engineers do their job. They don't get kickbacks for low mileage engines but they do sell more vehicles if they are efficient. Last edited by notevenclose : 05-14-2008 at 05:24 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 89
|
If you want to increase efficiency you can:
Lower the temperature of the intake air (ie cold air intake...or plumb the intake into the cab!). Open up the exhaust(cut the cats, cut the mufflers or both or duals...) Reduce drag Change your gearing to run the engine at lower rpm(not cheap) Lower the load on the engine(electric cooling fans, synthetic oils, etc.) I'm sure there is more but that's all I could think of right now. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
![]() |
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|